Sunday, November 2, 2008

Conference

Yes, I am writing this week about the conference I joined last week. I will not say the name of the conference but it is about 4G wireless technologies which is known as next generation wireless technologies.

I drove 3 hours from my house to the exhibition center, I left my home around 5:30am !!! and I was there around 8:30am. Traffic was awesome!!! I had fun on the road!!! The conference started around 9:00am. The first talk was about the definition
of 4G. The speaker is from Yankee group, and he was presenting some of the key issues about the 4G and some statistics about the wireless communications. Lots of predictions, assumptions, comments, questions .....

I was able to join the conference for one day, because the participation was very expensive. For the day I joined, I tried to get most out of it, I was filtering each information I received from presenters, and at the end of each session I was able to get couple of key words from the presentations. One of them is that in order to migrate from 3G to 4G, we need more time than expected. There are lots of issues that should be agreed upon, for instance standardization issues. Lots of wireless operators want to invest money on 4G technologies, but they can not even define what 4G is. Every company and every people has different definition, approach and totally different mindset about enabling 4G. Everyone talks about convergence of the systems, but converge to what???? Converge to divergence???

Unless the definitions, and technologies are not stated clearly, we really can not get benefit of 4G in the most efficient way. It is a great set of technologies if we agree on the purpose of it! We can not see how deep the water is unless we reach the bottom! The thing that makes me very happy about 4G, it seems it is a very deep water! Have you ever thought about 5G,6G,..., 100 G, 1000 G, 10^6 G?:) We should jump into the space. World is so small for 1000Gs!

Volkan Sevindik
Copyright 2008

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Collaboration

I dont know if you read Harvard Business Review, but I am subscriper of it.

In November 2008 issue of Harvard Business Review, there is an interview with John Chambers who is CEO of Cisco. I read all the interview. First of all, I like his approach to problems he encountered in Cisco, in general telecommunication business.

The whole interview is about business strategy. And he was stressing the importance of team work and colloboration. I have a couple of comments on this. Team work is essential in today's business world, but it is not enough. First of all, team members should not think that the degree of their contribution to the work decreases as time passes.

Human beings is more prone to finding excuses than finding answers. Therefore, working as a team makes it harder for individuals to motivate themselves. They will tend to outsource their self motivation capability to someone else in the team, manager or team-mate. So, although the team is working perfectly in technical sense, the team will be less productive in long term if it consists of people who have
communication problems with each other, or some problems other than communication issues.

Collaborative work environment is more than essential for success in today business world. On the other hand, bringing employees together does not mean collaboration for tomorrow's business world.

Success will come with multidimensional collaboration in future and today. Employees should collaborate emotionally, technically, professionally with each other. They should be competitive against competitors but not their team-mates. Of course, this brings us a very important and fundamental concept: MISSION and OBJECTIVE. Everyone should understand and state clearly the objective of business. Every employee should answer this question: What does their company stand for?

As long as team members keep their business objective in their mind, true collaboration will be achieved with little cost and with high return!


Volkan Sevindik

Copyright 2008

Sunday, October 19, 2008

INNOVATION!

Innovation! Today's magic word for making investment in technology, to get new customers, to persuade managers, etc.

I have been reading lots of articles from Harvard Business Review, Business Week, E-week, Forbes, CIO Magazine, CFO Magazine, Marketing News Week, International Journal of Marketing, Marketing Journal, lots of blogs, etc.

I read most of them weekly. Nearly all of the articles I read defines Innovation as a business process. Every time I read them, I forced myself to accept this definition but I could not persuade myself.

For me, Innovation is a product by itself. It is the definition of a product!. It is a product approach to everything in the company. If you create a marketing report, you should write it in a better way each time you write it. If you are a business analylist, you define business processes much better, everytime you redefine it, present it, report it, use it, analyze it.

Whatever you are doing now is a product, and next realese of this product has to be much better, much more understanable, much more readible, much more demandable and much more innovable!!

Innovability is to create an innovation potential in a product (This is my own definition). Evertime you innovate (you create your product), you should be make the product much more innovable next time. Otherwise, innovation (your product) will be at the end of the S-curve very soon!(product life cycle curve).

When you listen music, you feel the harmony of different frequencies of sound in the music. If there was only one frequency in the music, you would not listen it (because there is nothing to listen). Music would become so boring, without interaction of different frequencies with each other.

Now, think of each different sound frequency in the sound as innovation. If one of the frequencies is distorted, whole music would sound very bad!You immediately realize that this is not the music, not the harmony of the notes, not the perceft marriage of frequencies that you have been familiar before!

This is exaclty what I am trying to say about innovation. Innovation is a final product of a company which contains lots of innovations in itself.

Innovation is the harmony of the psychologies of making things better each time you do it, product it, sound it, imagine it!


Volkan Sevindik



Copyright 2008

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Corporations need technology in order to survive, right??

Corporations need technology in order to survive, right?? NO!!! It is not right at all.

Corporations need CASH to survive in marketplace,  and they need strong business objectives and mission for producing this cash. Technology can partly help companies to reach its business objectives.

Technology is not the key factor that makes firms more effective . Technology is only valuable if it meets the needs of the current business objectives.

As the world revolves, the business objectives will change, the ways that businesses produce cash will change, the way businesses use technology will change.

Before investing in the technology, companies should not think their short-term plans, they should think their long-term plans instead. That does not mean that they should invest large amount of money in  buying the fastest computer systems, or buying the most expensive ERP software. That means the opposite. They should buy the decent technology which is good enough for meeting their business goals and which is highly scalable for future enhancements (long-term business objectives).

By this way, companies will have an opportunity to test the technology without investing large amount of money in it (they can use this money for investing other strategic areas of business). They will have a chance to see if the technology they invested is helping them to reach their business goals which will help them to reach their long-term business goals.

They can test if current employees are having any trouble of learning it, or investing large amount their time in order to learn it. Based on these information, they should continue investing in the same technology or they can select other options to continue.

Never forget, technology is like leaves of a tree (company). Sometimes, the tree (company) will have it and sometimes the tree (company) will not have it! depending on the climate (marketplace)!


Volkan Sevindik

                                            Copyright 2008

Brand Identity: The Importance of Color

Color is an important consideration in your brand identity system. Colors have a significant impact on people’s emotional state. They also have been shown to impact people’s ability to concentrate and learn. They have a wide variety of specific mental associations. In fact, the effects are physiological, psychological, and sociological.

For instance:

•Non-primary colors are more calming than primary colors.
•Blue is the most calming of the primary colors, followed closely by a lighter red.
•Test takers score higher and weight lifters lift more in blue rooms.
•Blue text increases reading retention.
•Yellow evokes cheerfulness. Houses with yellow trim or flower gardens sell faster.
•Reds and oranges encourage diners to eat quickly and leave. Red also makes food more appealing and influences people to eat more. (It is no coincidence that fast food restaurants almost always use these colors.)
•Pink enhances appetites and has been shown to calm prison inmates.
•Blue and black suppress appetites.
•Children prefer primary colors. (Notice that children’s toys and books often use these colors.)
•Forest green and burgundy appeals to the wealthiest 3 percent of Americans and often raises the perceived price of an item.
•Orange is often used to make an expensive item seem less expensive.
•Red clothing can convey power.
•Red trim is used in bars and casinos because it can cause people to lose track of time.
•White is typically associated with cool, clean and fresh.
•Red is often associated with Christmas and orange with Halloween and Thanksgiving.
•Red and black are often associated with sexy and seductive and are favored by porn sites.
•Black clothes make people look thinner.
•Black is also associated with elegance and sophistication. It also seems mysterious.
•Black is the favorite color of Goths.

Colors also have a functional impact on readability, eye-strain, ability to attract attention, ability to be seen at night, etc. This is important in choosing colors for signing, website pages, prints ads, and other marketing media.

•The most visible color is yellow.
•The most legible of all color combinations are black on yellow and green on white followed by red on white.
•It is no surprise that most traffic signs use these color combinations.
•Black on white is the easiest to read, on paper, and on computer screens.
•Hard colors (red, orange and yellow) are more visible and tend to make objects look larger and closer. They are easier to focus upon. They create excitement and cause people to over-estimate time.
•Soft colors (violet, blue and green) are less visible and tend to make objects look smaller and further away. They aren’t as easy to focus upon. They have a calming effect, increase concentration, and cause people to under-estimate time.

Usually, it is advantageous for a brand to consistently “own” certain colors, which provide an additional recognition cue. The George Eastman House International Museum of Photography and Film in Rochester, New York has taken a different, but equally effective approach. They intended to communicate that they are a fun and vibrant organization that features much more than artistic black and white photography. So, the “e” icon in their logo appears in a rainbow of colors. Each business card features the logo with a different color. The name itself always only appears in black and white.

Obviously, colors are an important part of any brand identity system. Testing the affect of a new brand identity system’s colors is well advised. It is important to consider that color associations will vary by individual, and especially culture, due to the cultural context and previous experiences with the colors. All of the impacts of colors are equally true of music, scents and sounds. For instance, studies have identified that music has an impact on supermarket sales, mental concentration, achievement on standardized tests, factory productivity, clerical performance and staff turnover, among other things.

Primary source: “Color Psychology: Meanings and Effects of Colors”

Information-Technology Product Roundup

The Wireless Laser Desktop 7000 includes an ergonomic keyboard and rechargeable, high-definition laser mouse with a charging station. The keyboard features hot keys for one-touch access to most-used Web sites, files and folders. The mouse features four-way scrolling and five customizable buttons.

Wireless Keyboard/Mouse

Designed to complement Windows Vista OS, the Wireless Laser Desktop 7000 includes an ergonomic keyboard and rechargeable, high-definition laser mouse with a charging station. The keyboard features hot keys for one-touch access to most-used Web sites, files and folders. The mouse features four-way scrolling and five customizable buttons. Users can work up to 30 feet away from the transceiver, even if it is out of sight.-Microsoft Relevant Products/Services

E-Discovery Archive Service

With the managed service ActiveVault 4.0, enterprises can consolidate, archive and manage inactive data from virtually any media source into an accessible format in order to apply and enforce retention policies and legal holds to ensure data is properly retained and managed. Self-service early case-assessment tools are available through a Web browser interface.-RenewData

Peripheral Device Control

Delivering access control at plug-and-play ports and drives, DeviceLock 6.3 prevents employees from using corporate or personal mobile Relevant Products/Services computing resources to extract information beyond the scope of security policy guidelines.

Featuring centralized management integrated with Microsoft Active Directory, DeviceLock enables administrators to control, monitor, shadow-copy, log and analyze end-user access to USB and FireWire devices, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth adapters, CD and DVD drives, serial and parallel ports, local and network printers, PDAs, smart phones and other plug-and-play devices. Local sync filtering allows IT administrators to set permissions for different objects transferring to or from PDAs running Palm OS.-DeviceLock

BlackBerry Monitoring

Zenprise 3.3 monitors the overall health of the entire BlackBerry infrastructure and automatically troubleshoots BlackBerry end-user challenges with detailed detection of user-specific issues such as low battery life, weak signal strength or low available device memory. Enterprises can proactively identify issues outside their infrastructure that impact users, such as wireless Relevant Products/Services carrier outages or users traveling in and out of network coverage areas.

The software collects and analyzes data across the BlackBerry Enterprise Server, Exchange and Active Directory infrastructure, and provides a holistic view of the entire BlackBerry environment. Zenprise also checks wireless carrier availability, Active Directory health, RIM SRP availability, WAN/LAN network performance and overall Exchange server Relevant Products/Serviceshealth.-Zenprise

© 2008 Communications News. All rights reserved.
© 2008 Mobile Tech Today. All rights reserved.

Global telecom revenue to hit $2 trillion in '08

Global telecom revenue will reach $2 trillion by the end of 2008, an increase of 7.6% over telecom revenue in 2007, research firm Gartner projects.

One of the biggest drivers for telecom growth in 2008 has been the expansion of the Asian telecom market, which Gartner says will surpass the North American market in total revenues for the first time in 2008. In total, the Asian telecom revenues will grow by 8% to $513 billion this year, just barely surpassing North American telecom revenues, which are projected to grow by 4.5% and to total $511.6 billion. Looking forward, Gartner expects the Middle East and Africa to be the fastest-growing regions for telecom revenues over the next four years, with a compound annual growth rate of 8.6% projected between 2007 and 2012.

As far as trends within the telecom industry, Gartner projects that mobile services will continue to eclipse fixed-line services and that a strong increase in mobile data services and fixed-mobileconvergence services will increase customers’ need to invest in new telecom equipment. Specifically, Gartner says that the ratio of mobile connections to fixed connections will exceed 4-to-1 by 2012 and that revenue from mobile telecom services will top $1 trillion by 2010. And because mobile data use is expected to expand rapidly over the next five years, Gartner projects that the telecom equipment segment will see a compound annual growth rate of 8.7% between now and 2012, as customers invest in new technology that will support their mobile bandwidth and fixed-mobile convergence requirements.

“Our breakdown of services clearly shows that fixed voice is in decline, but mobile voice, though currently growing, will also stagnate as a proportion of the market by 2012,” says Gartner analyst Will Hahn. “The baton has clearly been passed to data services in the legacy sector.”

While telecom revenue is projected to see solid growth this year, Gartner also projected last month that spending on both telecom services and IT in general would slow worldwide in 2009. Telecom spending, which accounts for more than half of all IT spending worldwide, will grow by a projected 6% and will total nearly $2.1trillion in 2009. Spending on software (8% projected growth in 2009) and IT services (7% projected growth in 2009) will be the fastest-growing services next year, while computing hardware spending is projected to slow to just 4% growth next year, down from 10% spending growth on hardware worldwide in 2007.

Solving problems that matter

Chris Brogan’s post (Solve Some Real World Problems) this morning really caught my attention. It’s a call to action for startups and individuals alike to rethink how they might use their businesses or positions to help solve real problems in the world. As Solvers at InnoCentive I know you are motivated by the chance to really impact the world, not just the chance to earn money. InnoCentive’s philanthropic endeavors, and the amazing potential this business has to enable individuals to contribute to solving the world’s most important Challenges was a large part of my motivation when I took this job as the marketing manager and social media evangelist. This year you have helped bringing solar powered light to Africa through SunightSolar, helped innovate ways to clean up remaining oil in Alaska for OSRI, and are currently sending in your research results on how to help detect a biomarker for ALS/Lou Gehrig’s Disease.

I had an interesting conversation with Michael Anuzis yesterday about ways to continue to improve the depth of opportunity that InnoCentive offers to contributers who want to make a difference in the world. He is one of many individuals who have blogged, called, emailed or dm’d me recently with ideas for growing our business. It’s pretty inspiring to see how strongly people believe in the concept of InnoCentive. He suggested that we find a way to allow individuals to contribute small amounts of money towards innovation projects they see on InnoCentive.com. Much like the contribution model of our friends at Global Giving. I suggested that perhaps we could even allow individuals to post an idea for a Challenge that they feel strongly about, and then use the website as a way to gather financial support around it. Once the support has hit a certain level, they would be allowed to post the Challenge and ask for solutions. These are just initial ideas, and I know you have more - please share them with us! As we grow the business, especially the philanthropic side of the business, we want to hear your thoughts.

Qualcomm looks to the skies for future chipset technologies

Qualcomm is delving back into the satellite business, announcing today that it will produce a new line of hybrid cellular-satellite chipsets designed to work over the orbital networks of two newly rejuvenated satellite operators ICO and Mobile Satellite Ventures.

The vendor has agreed to develop a satellite protocol and include it in firmware of future multi-mode baseband chips. Those chips in turn can be embedded in satellite phones as well as consumer appliances and vehicle dash boards, enabling two-way communications to both terrestrial and satellite networks. Qualcomm is targeting the L-band and S-band frequencies initially, over which both MSV and ICO operate as well as other newly revived satellite ventures such as UMTS/satellite hybrid operator TerreStar.

MSV, a subsidiary of SkyTerra, is launching a more traditional voice and broadband network and is planning to wholesale data and voice connectivity to other operators, whether cellular carriers looking to off universal coverage or wireline operators wanting to extend their services wirelessly.

ICO, the most recent brainchild of telecom visionary Craig McCaw, is taking a more media-centric approach to its S-band service. Using a variation of Digital Video Broadcast-Handheld (DVB-H) called DVB-Satellite Handheld (or DVB-SH), ICO is launching a broadcast digital TV network with a particular focus on the automotive industry. While the service could potentially compete directly with Qualcomm’s Forward Link Only (FLO) multicast TV technology and its MediaFLO service, Qualcomm will supply ICO with the crucial dual-mode chipsets that will allow ICO customers to connect back to the network. ICO plans to supplement the TV programming with OnStar-like emergency calling services as well as vehicle navigation and other location-based services, necessitating a two-way communications link.

Qualcomm will not be including DVB-SH received chips into its silicon; ICO will have to source those chips from another vendor. But ICO vice president of public relations Christopher Doherty said a deal with a supplier the size of Qualcomm is critical to its business. Qualcomm produces the majority of the world’s CDMA chips and a good deal of its UMTS chips, making it the prime source of silicon for cellular communications. By embedding the satellite capabilities into some of its chipset lines, ICO device makers can cut down on the number of components in their hybrid devices. Nor will they have to seek alternate vendors for satellite components if they already do business will Qualcomm. “They give us the scale we would otherwise be unable to achieve,” Doherty said.

This certainly isn’t Qualcomm’s first venture into the satellite communications business. It produced dual-mode satellite-CDMA phones for Globalstar in 1999, when the satellite communications business was on the rise and Qualcomm still had a handset division. But bankruptcy after bankruptcy killed off those mobile satellite services businesses in the late 90s, leading the industry to writing off mobile satellite services (MSS) as deal except in a few vertical markets. In the last two years though, MSS has enjoyed a resurgence, fueled by new investment and healthier post-bankruptcy balance sheets. The biggest catalyst for satellite’s revival has been the FCC’s recent grants ofAncillary Terrestrial Component (ATC) allowances to newly renamed satellite operators like MSV, ICO and TerreStar. ATC allows those operators to use part of their satellite spectrum for terrestrial networks as a way to augment their services in high-density areas where line-of-site and capacity become problems—an approach taken by satellite media companies like XM.

TerreStar, for instance, is using Nokia Siemens Networks high-speed packet access (HSPA) as the terrestrial component to its satellite broadband service. While those ATC allowances have been limited to the S-band and L-band operators so far, more companies may jump on the bandwagon if the business model proves viable. Satellite TV giant EchoStar has been testing DVB-SH technology with Alcatel-Lucent, which it could eventually pair with a terrestrial network using the 700 MHz spectrum it won at auction.


Recommended Reading

In Designing Interactions, author Bill Moggridge introduces readers to 40 influential designers who have shaped our interaction with technology. The book comes with a DVD that contains segments from interviews with all the innovators discussed in the book.

Designing Interactions
by Bill Moggridge

book8.24.JPG



Hardcover, 766pp
Triliteral, October 2006
ISBN-13: 9780262134743
First Edition with DVD

B&N online price: $42.95
B&N member price: $34.36
Buy at B&N now.



SYNOPSIS
A pioneer in interaction design tells the stories of designers who changed the way people use everyday things in the digital era, interviewing the founders of Google, the creator of The Sims, the inventors and developers of the mouse and the desktop, and many others.

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY
Award-winning designer Bill Moggridge is a founder of IDEO, one of the most successful design firms in the world and one of the first to integrate the design of software and hardware into the practice of industrial design. He has been visiting professor in Interaction Design at the Royal College of Art in London, lecturer in Design at the London Business School, member of the Steering Committee for the Interaction Design Institute in Ivrea, Italy, and is currently a consulting associate professor in the Joint Program in Design at Stanford University.

FROM THE PUBLISHER
Digital technology has changed the way we interact with everything from the games we play to the tools we use at work. Designers of digital technology products no longer regard their job as designing a physical object — beautiful or utilitarian — but as designing our interactions with it. In Designing Interactions, award-winning designer Bill Moggridge introduces us to forty influential designers who have shaped our interaction with technology. Moggridge, designer of the first laptop computer (the GRiD Compass, 1981) and a founder of the design firm IDEO, tells us these stories from an industry insider's viewpoint, tracing the evolution of ideas from inspiration to outcome. The innovators he interviews — including Will Wright, creator of The Sims, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, the founders of Google, and Doug Engelbart, Bill Atkinson and others involved in the invention and development of the mouse and the desktop — have been instrumental in making a difference in the design of interactions. Their stories chart the history of entrepreneurial design development for technology.

Moggridge and his interviewees discuss such questions as why a personal computer has a window in a desktop, what made Palm's hand-held organizers so successful, what turns a game into a hobby, why Google is the search engine of choice, and why 30 million people in Japan choose the i-mode service for their cell phones. And Moggridge tells the story of his own design process and explains the focus on people and prototypes that has been successful at IDEO — how the needs and desires of people can inspire innovative designs and how prototyping methods are evolving for the design of digital technology.

Designing Interactions is illustrated with more than 700 images, with color throughout. Accompanying the book is a DVD that contains segments from all the interviews intercut with examples of the interactions under discussion.

"This will be the book — the book that summarizes how the technology of interaction came into being and prescribes how it will advance in the future. Written by the designer who was there, who helped make it happen, who pioneered the digital revolution. Essential, exciting, and a delight for both eyes and mind." -Don Norman, Nielsen Norman Group and Northwestern University, author of Emotional Design

Shoring up Supply Chain Security

Supply chain security breaches can damage brands, break down partnerships and, ultimately, hurt the bottom line. When creating a security framework, consider the following key areas to minimize supply chain risk.

When it comes to securing the supply chain, businesses should not only protect themselves but also their suppliers, customers and the general public. Failure to do so could result in potentially ruinous consequences, Logistics Managementsays, such as:

  1. Widespread disruption to delivery capabilities, which can lead to loss of revenue and service failure in the eyes of customers;
  2. Reduced brand equity — especially if customers see the security breakdown as a result of neglect;
  3. Investor discontent due to revenue loss;
  4. Increase in regulatory scrutiny;
  5. Legal liability; and
  6. Loss of supply chain partners.

Suffice it to say that no business would want to suffer the above — especially given the currently volatile economy. A recent study by Aberdeen Group shows that few companies can afford to ignore supply chain risks. Almost 99 percent of the 138 companies surveyed suffered a supply chain disruption and 58 percent suffered a financial loss, Modern Materials Handling reports.

To help companies tackle the challenges for securing the supply chain, Logistics Management identified several competencies from which to create a security framework. They are:

Process Strategy
To implement a security strategy, everyone must be on board and employees must know their managers are committed to the same goal. According to Aberdeen, more than a third of the companies interviewed had an enterprise risk department, but only 3 percent said that department was actually implementing and managing supply chain risk management initiatives.

It's no help to have a chief security officer if that person doesn't actually do anything. "Top management must be visible in their commitment and dedication to implementing security initiatives," Logistics Management says.

Process Management and Process Technology
Process management is making sure that all the raw materials coming in and all the finished goods coming out of your plant are secure. It also involves ensuring that the manufacturing process is safe.

For example, a U.S. Chemical Safety Board study in November 2006 found that 281 industrial dust-related fires and explosions killed 119 people and caused more than 718 injuries in the U.S. between 1980 to 2005, the Wall Street Journalreports. "In many accidents, employers and employees were unaware that a hazard even existed," the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) notes.

Something as seemingly unimportant as dust could cause a business to lose thousands of dollars because no one made sure the dust levels were safe for the processes in the plant.

Process technology, which is directly tied to process management, involves the means by which companies track the products coming in and out. With counterfeiting now 5 percent to 7 percent of the world trade, according to IndustryWeek, manufacturers need to keep a close eye on the raw materials coming in and make sure it is their products — not counterfeited ones — that reach the store shelves.

The U.S. economy loses as much as $250 billion annually to counterfeiting, IndustryWeek reports. It suggests partnering with governmental and non-governmental agencies to protect supplies and goods.

Individual product protection can be done by using holographic labels and other authentication devices throughout the distribution supply chain. U.S. congress is currently considering making the use of security markings on some pharmaceutical products mandatory after Malaysia's success with a similar program, Packaging Digest reports.

Since the program was introduced, there was a significant increase in the identification and confiscation of illegal items entering the distribution chain.

Infrastructure Management and Communication Management
Infrastructure management is basically protecting the physical facility. Ready Business provides a guideline on how to keep your building safe, recommending manufacturers:

  • Make building site maps available and mark emergency routes;
  • Consider installing closed circuit TV, access control, security guards or other security systems;
  • Secure all the ways people enter and leave the building and what they have access to;
  • Identify essential equipment to keep the business open; and
  • Comply with all local, state and federal codes and other safety regulations.

The second part of this is making sure your employees know where to turn when they have security issues or if they witnessed a security breach. "Not collaborating within the company can also put companies at extra risk," Aberdeen says. "When decision makers are not alerted on time to possible risks, a more damaging disruption is likely."

Management Technology
Management technology is using technology to detect and share potential threats and security information internally and externally. "These information systems are also critical in obtaining and sharing information with suppliers, customers, vendors and government agencies," Logistics Management says.

Information technology/systems are usually the first to detect breaches or product contamination. Businesses can choose to have multiple systems for inspecting and checking the manufacturing process or have a single network defense that combines hardware, software and networking technologies, CIO.com says.

U.S. companies spent $3.85 billion on network security appliances in 2006 with expenditure expected to double by 2011, market researcher IDC says (via CIO.com).

Metrics
To ensure the security strategy is working, every business must measure its success constantly. The Center for Internet Security (CIS) has developed benchmarks to identify and define key information security metrics, as noted by Information Security.

CIS expects to expand the benchmarks list to 20 items in the next year, but for now considers these key areas a high priority:

  • Average time between security incidents;
  • Mean recovery time;
  • Percent of systems configured to standard;
  • Percent of systems with antivirus; and
  • Percent of applications that had risk and vulnerability assessment.

Relationship Management
Most businesses cannot function without their supply chain partners, which is why it is critical that all partners involved are on the same page when it comes to security. "Collaboration with external entities (customers/suppliers and service providers) is necessary to ensure that security procedures are communicated and followed," Logistics Management stresses.

Those with global partners need to be even better at managing these relationships as they are "often unable to monitor these partners and protect against theft, contamination or insertion of counterfeit cargo," Logistics Management adds.

Public Interface Management
Public interface management is forging relationships with the government and the public about security. "Working together, government and industry can better understand and address the nation's most pressing security needs and create meaningful initiatives to address those needs," Homeland Security Today says.

Logistics Management suggests actively participating in the development of government standards or security initiatives as one way of fostering these relationships.


Resources

Supply Chain Security: A Framework for Protecting Your Supply Chain
by David Closs, Cheri Speier, Judith Whipple and M. Douglass Voss
Logistics Management, Sept. 1, 2008

Supply Chain Disruptions Plague Most Companies
by Allison Manning
Modern Materials Handling, Aug. 27, 2008

Stop Counterfeiters from Jeopardizing Your Brand and Bottom Line
by Brian W. Lewis, Parter, Nicole Nocera, Partner and E. Tim Walker
IndustryWeek, Sept. 19, 2008

Dust Cloud Settles Over Industries
by Paulo Prada, Betsy McKay and Stephanie Chen
The Wall Street Journal, May 2, 2008

How Holograms Can Stop Counterfeiting
Packaging Digest, Aug. 1, 2008

Secure Facilities, Buildings & Plants
Ready Business

Unified Threat Management, Demystified
by Bill Snyder
CIO.com, March 24, 2008

CIS Takes the Measure of Information Security
by Neil Roiter
Information Security, Sept. 9, 2008

A Culture of Security: Making It Automatic
by Steve King
Homeland Security Today, Sept. 1, 2008

Thursday, February 28, 2008

E-Tickets Only Starting June 1

Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, February 23, 2008; Page D01

Mark your calendars: In 100 days, airlines around the world plan to stop issuing paper tickets.

The International Air Transport Association, a trade group representing 240 airlines, announced yesterday that starting June 1, its members will use only electronic tickets. The airlines, which include the big U.S. carriers, account for 94 percent of international air traffic.

Exceptions will be made for small airlines that can't afford new computer systems, but they'll have to pay for the privilege.

"It's about simplifying the business," said Steve Lott, the association's spokesman. The change will make it easier and cheaper for airlines to issue tickets, he said.

Once, travelers purchased airline tickets through travel agents, and paper tickets were mailed to their homes. If you lost your paper ticket or if it was stolen, you could lose your flight.

Today, more people use the Internet to book flights, and the reservations are stored in the airlines' computers. Travelers can print e-tickets at home or at airports. If you lose an e-ticket, you can print another.

"It's the convenience -- to be able to book a ticket and get my boarding pass without waiting in line or talking to a person," said Josko Silobrcic of Boston, who was using the US Airways check-in kiosk at Reagan National Airport yesterday afternoon.

The IATA is the clearinghouse for paper tickets, distributing ticket stock that airlines and travel agents order from specialized printers. On June 1, it will stop that service.

"It is a hard-and-fast deadline," Lott said.

E-tickets aren't as prevalent in other countries as they are in the United States, where they are used in 97 percent of air travel. In Russia and other countries of the former Soviet Union, that figure is only 54 percent because of legislation that banned e-tickets until last year. Some airlines, which are typically small and fly to remote regions, will now have to choose whether to invest in new computer systems or begin buying and processing paper tickets themselves. Some of the smallest airlines may do so because it will be cheaper, Lott said.

For most major airlines, e-tickets will cut costs. While a paper ticket costs $10 to create and process, an e-ticket costs $1. The switch will save the industry $3 billion a year, according to the IATA.

If passengers do not have access to the Internet or printers, they can continue to purchase tickets by phone or through travel agents. Instead of receiving paper tickets in advance, customers will be asked to pick them up at airline counters or kiosks in airports.


Airlines still need to work out some kinks. Computer reservation systems need to be reprogrammed for infants who don't take seats but need boarding passes.

Airlines also will adjust their systems to allow passengers on two-leg trips to transfer from one airline to another and check their bags through. In the past, paper tickets were required because different reservation systems didn't work together.

The switch to all-electronic ticketing is part of a program started in June 2004, when high oil prices and financial losses prompted airlines to reconsider their business models. Plans include ticketing kiosks where passengers can check in for flights on five different airlines.

Laila Mikhail, an agent with Up and Away Travel in Fairfax, said she rarely issues paper tickets. "We already moved to the e-ticket a long time ago," she said. "That's nothing new."

Airlines added fees for paper tickets as an incentive to go electronic. In 2002, Northwest Airlines increased its paper-ticket surcharge from $10 to $25.

As for the people who prefer paper tickets: Too bad, Mikhail said.

"They like to have something in their hand, but welcome to the 21st century," she said. "They'll get used to it and they'll like it."

Cynthia Stranis of St. Louis said she has used e-tickets since American Airlines installed check-in kiosks at Lambert-St. Louis International Airport.

"It's quick; you get to see the aircraft layout," Stranis said yesterday at Reagan National. "It's one less thing to think about when you're packing."

Goldman Sachs Predicts Downturn in U.S. IT Spending

IT services fall short of greatness, CIOs say

Technology leaders want to improve how IT supports the business, but without being involved in strategic decisions at the highest level, many say IT can't realize its goal of adding value to the bottom line.











Nearly 80% of 125 CIOs and senior IT directors polled said a lack of senior representation at the board level had a direct impact on their ability to deliver great -- rather than just good -- IT services. Good IT services for the purposes of this survey were defined as "merely day-to-day maintenance and firefighting." Great IT services were defined as "a series of strategic business/operational processes that add value to the bottom line."


Download the latest Network World Executive Guide - Special Report: Consolidated Recovery

The "Great vs. Good IT" research was conducted in January 2008 by Omniboss, a division of Vanson Bourne, and commissioned by Touchpaper, an international provider of IT services and other management products. The survey found that more than 40% of CIOs and senior IT directors did not believe that their department delivered great IT services. Another 42% of those polled reported that they are not involved in the decision-making processes around major organizational changes until the implementation stage or later. In addition, 44% of technology leaders confirmed they don’t have an IT representative at the board level.

Others cited technology among the issues holding them back from maturing service delivery from good to great. For instance, 55% attributed their lack of great service delivery within IT to not having systems and processes in place to make IT changes effectively. Nearly half (49%) reported they lacked solutions to automate the handling of day-to-day IT service and support issues.

"Without a doubt, the time has come when 'good' simply isn't good enough in terms of IT service delivery. 'Good' may keep users happy, but it leaves the CIO reduced to somebody who spends their whole day just putting out fires," said Graham Ridgway, CEO of Touchpaper, in a company statement.

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Nokia unveils concept phone Morph

NEW YORK and ESPOO, Finland, February 25 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ --
Morph, a joint nanotechnology concept, developed by Nokia Research Center
(NRC) (NYSE: NOK) and the University of Cambridge (UK) - was launched today
alongside the "Design and the Elastic Mind" exhibition, on view from
February 24 to May 12, 2008, at The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New
York. Morph features in both the exhibition catalog and on MoMA's official
website.

Morph is a concept that demonstrates how future mobile devices might be
stretchable and flexible, allowing the user to transform their mobile
device into radically different shapes. It demonstrates the ultimate
functionality that nanotechnology might be capable of delivering: flexible
materials, transparent electronics and self-cleaning surfaces. Dr. Bob
Iannucci, Chief Technology Officer, Nokia, commented: "Nokia Research
Center is looking at ways to reinvent the form and function of mobile
devices; the Morph concept shows what might be possible."

Dr. Tapani Ryhanen, Head of the NRC Cambridge UK laboratory, Nokia,
commented: "We hope that this combination of art and science will showcase
the potential of nanoscience to a wider audience. The research we are
carrying out is fundamental to this as we seek a safe and controlled way to
develop and use new materials."

Professor Mark Welland, Head of the Department of Engineering's
Nanoscience Group at the University of Cambridge and University Director of
Nokia-Cambridge collaboration added: "Developing the Morph concept with
Nokia has provided us with a focus that is both artistically inspirational
but, more importantly, sets the technology agenda for our joint nanoscience
research that will stimulate our future work together."

The partnership between Nokia and the University of Cambridge was
announced in March, 2007 - an agreement to work together on an extensive
and long term programme of joint research projects. NRC has established a
research facility at the University's West Cambridge site and collaborates
with several departments - initially the Nanoscience Center and Electrical
Division of the Engineering Department - on projects that, to begin with,
are centered on nanotechnology.

Elements of Morph might be available to integrate into handheld devices
within 7 years, though initially only at the high-end. However,
nanotechnology may one day lead to low cost manufacturing solutions, and
offers the possibility of integrating complex functionality at a low price.

For further information, please visit the websites
http://www.moma.org/elasticmind and http://www.nokia.com/A4126514

Photos are available on http://www.nokia.com/press -> Photos ->
Corporate - Research and Development.

About Nokia Research Center

Nokia Research Center (NRC) looks beyond Nokia's existing business and
product development to challenge current strategies and to stimulate
renewal in the company's direction. Working closely with all Nokia business
units, NRC's research explores new frontiers in digital services,
physical-digital connections, human interaction, data and content
technologies, device architecture, and access and connectivity. NRC
promotes open innovation by working on research projects in collaboration
with universities and research institutes around the world. For more
information, see our website: http://research.nokia.com

About Nokia

Nokia is the world leader in mobility, driving the transformation and
growth of the converging Internet and communications industries. Nokia
makes a wide range of mobile devices and provides people with experiences
in music, navigation, video, television, imaging, games and business. Nokia
also provides equipment, solutions and services for communications
networks.

About the University of Cambridge

The University of Cambridge will celebrate its 800th anniversary in
2009. It is one of the finest universities in the world, a superb British
university with global reach. It is renowned for its 31 colleges and world
class teaching departments, ground breaking research and breathtaking
architecture. It attracts the very best and brightest students, regardless
of background, and offers one of the UK's most generous bursary schemes.

Cambridge was recently ranked number two in the world and the number
one University outside the US, in two separate surveys, the Shanghai Jiao
Tong University 2006 survey, and in the Times Higher Education magazine's
world rankings.

Cambridge people have been awarded more Nobel Prizes than those from
any other UK university with more than 80 laureates.

The Nanoscience Centre is an 1800msquared research facility completed
in January 2003 and located at the north east corner of the University's
West Cambridge Site. The Centre provides open access to over 300
researchers from a variety of University Departments to the nanofabrication
and characterisation facilities housed in a combination of Clean Rooms and
low noise laboratories. Office space is primarily home to the Department of
Engineering's Nanoscience Group, technical and administrative staff and
members of other research groups who require long term access to
facilities. http://www.nanoscience.cam.ac.uk

Motorola Names Paul J. Liska Chief Financial Officer

SCHAUMBURG, Ill., Feb. 21 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Motorola, Inc. (NYSE: MOT - News) today announced Paul J. Liska has been named executive vice president and chief financial officer (CFO) of Motorola, effective March 1, 2008. Mr. Liska will report directly to Greg Brown, president and chief executive officer. Tom Meredith, the company's acting CFO will continue as a non-management board member and will work closely with Mr. Liska to ensure a smooth transition.

Brown stated, "Since appointing Tom Meredith as acting CFO, we have undertaken a thorough search process to identify candidates with financial, operational and strategic experience. We are fortunate that Paul has such a broad set of general management and CFO experiences. Paul will be a very valuable addition to our team and he is well-suited to drive forward the important work already underway to enhance our financial performance."

Brown added, "On behalf of the board and the management team, I want to thank Tom for his significant contributions over the last year. He has played an important role in improving Motorola's cash conversion cycle and cost structure. The changes implemented under Tom's leadership have helped position Motorola for renewed success. I am pleased that Tom will help through this key transition period."

Prior to joining Motorola, Mr. Liska served as an industrial partner for various private equity firms including MidOcean Partners, CVC Capital Holdings and Ripplewood Holdings LLC. From 2004 to 2006, Mr. Liska served as executive chairman of US Freightways until its purchase by Yellow Roadway Corporation and served in various capacities with Weekly Reader Companies, including executive chairman. From 2001 to 2004, Mr. Liska held several positions with Sears, Roebuck and Co., including president of credit and financial products and executive vice president and chief financial officer. Prior to joining Sears, Mr. Liska was executive vice president and chief financial officer of The St. Paul Companies from 1997 to 2001.

About Motorola

Motorola is known around the world for innovation in communications. The company develops technologies, products and services that make mobile experiences possible. Our portfolio includes communications infrastructure, enterprise mobility solutions, digital set-tops, cable modems, mobile devices and Bluetooth accessories. Motorola is committed to delivering next generation communication solutions to people, businesses and governments. A Fortune 100 company with global presence and impact, Motorola had sales of US $36.6 billion in 2007. For more information about our company, our people and our innovations, please visit http://www.motorola.com.

Source: Motorola, Inc.

Microsoft looking for ways to converge Windows Mobile, Zune

Microsoft appears to be looking for new ways to tie Windows Mobile phones and Zune media players together, although a Zune phone remains unlikely.

Over the weekend, Microsoft developer "Mel" asked an open question on the Windows Mobile blog: "What are some ways the Zune player and a Windows Mobile device can work better together?"

Since then, more than 50 commenters have suggested ways that Microsoft might converge the two devices. The most common idea is to essentially replace the Windows Media Player on Windows Mobile devices with Zune software.

"I proposed that WMP should be fazed out in favor of a combined WMP/Zune player which will synch with both Windows Media AND Zune, instead of having to have two separate apps with two different libraries for each device," wrote one commenter using the name Colin Walker.

Peter Henning, another commenter, also suggested making just one media player that works on both devices. "Currently you are just making our lives much more difficult with this parallel development and incompatibilities," he wrote.

A single media player would solve some of the problems that other users complained about in syncing music between a Windows Mobile phone and a Zune. Another commenter going by the name Charlie Quidnunc noted that he has to create new playlists once he transfers music from Zune to his phone because Windows Media Player can't read Zune playlists.

Another complained that he can't transfer music that he downloaded under his Zune subscription plan to his Windows Mobile device because of DRM restrictions.

Offering Zune software on Windows Mobile phones could be one simple way for Microsoft to converge the two, said Michael Gartenberg, a research director with Jupiter Research. "There are any number of ways that Microsoft could go about Zune integration. We might see a Zune application for Windows Mobile devices."

But what we most likely won't see is a Zune phone, despite many Zune phone rumors. "On one hand, the Zune is a closed proprietary system not built around a partner ecosystem," Gartenberg noted. "On the other hand, the phone business is built on a partner ecosystem." Microsoft develops the Windows Mobile software, but hardware makers build the phones. By contrast, Microsoft develops the hardware and software for the Zune.

If Microsoft started making a Zune phone, it would compete with its phone hardware partners. "It's the same reason we don't see a Microsoft-branded PC," he said.

On the Windows Mobile blog, "Mel" emphasized that wasn't looking for more suggestions of a Zune phone. "I'm not referring to an imaginary 'Zune phone,' and I'm certainly not hinting or speculating about a converged device," he wrote.

Building a better music playing experience into Windows Mobile will be important for Microsoft, which is increasingly trying to make Windows Mobile phones appeal to consumers and not just business users. "For the most part, Windows Mobile has ignored consumers," Gartenberg said.

Microsoft recently announced plans to buy Danger, the developer of mobile phone software that runs the youth-oriented Sidekick device from T-Mobile. Microsoft has also made some executive changes in the Windows Mobile group designed to better focus on consumers.


Google